Tag

Rules

Browsing


Chicago members of the National Association of Realtors say they’re prepared for the changes that some housing experts describe as the industry’s largest shift in how homes are bought and sold.

NAR, a professional organization of real estate agents whose members are known as Realtors, will be implementing two major changes starting Saturday as part of a $418 million antitrust settlement.

The changes upend more than a decade of industry procedures and could affect how buyer agents have traditionally been paid. It could also open up more opportunities for homebuyers and sellers.

“What we’re really going through is a seismic shift,” said Matt Silver, a partner and senior broker in Corcoran Urban Real Estate.

The NAR doesn’t expect home prices or sales to fall but says the changes could make it harder for first-time homebuyers in a frenzied real estate market.

What’s the biggest change?

Offers of broker compensation no longer will be displayed on the Multiple Listing Service, a database used by licensed brokers and agents to share information about properties for sale as well as commissions.

Historically, broker commissions have been paid by sellers. Seller’s agents usually agree to split their commission with the buyer’s agent. That means homebuyers often don’t incur an extra cost when working with a real estate agent — a big relief for first-time buyers — as their agent’s commission is covered by the seller.

Commissions typically range from 5% to 6%.

Compensation offers will still be an option consumers can pursue off MLS through negotiation and consultation with real estate professionals, according to NAR, which says broker commissions have always been negotiable.

How agents are compensated is “the biggest change our industry has had to deal with in easily 100 years,” according to Laura Ellis, Baird & Warner’s chief strategy officer, executive vice president and president of residential sales, who has been with the firm since 1998.

Ellis said the change will create more conversations between real estate agents and clients, requiring agents to use different skills than they might be used to.

Laura Ellis of Baird & Warner at the company’s Gold Coast office.

Barry Brecheisen/For the Sun-Times

“We did a big push on educating our agents about the fact that most buyers thought that the process or the service to them was free because … the seller technically paid the commission,” Ellis said. “Transparency in that alone is a big difference.”

Many real estate agents have been letting clients know in advance about the changes. And trade groups have been sharing updates for months with their members ahead of Saturday’s deadline.

Why is this happening now?

The changes stem from a series of class-action lawsuits filed by homeowners, who accused the NAR of fixing broker commissions at high rates and discouraging sellers from seeking better terms. The association has 1.5 million members and broad control over access to the MLS system.

The NAR agreed to settle the lawsuit in March., ending litigation that could have resulted in a $1.8 billion verdict against the association and tripled under antitrust law.

In April, a federal judge in Missouri granted preliminary approval to the settlement. A final approval hearing is scheduled in November.

The NAR has denied any wrongdoing.

Are other changes coming?

The settlement also requires all real estate agents working with a buyer to enter a written agreement outlining compensation before touring homes.

Some Chicago real estate agents say the written agreement requires less of an adjustment for them because they already use buyer-broker agreements.

Erika Villegas, a real estate agent for more than 20 years, said she’s always used buyer-broker agreements even though her firm, Oak Park’s RE/MAX In the Village, never required them. Villegas said requiring the document industrywide will be beneficial.

“I think it’s a great opportunity for us to make sure that we are providing the best tools, best services and we [are] making it very clear and transparent of the work that we do for buyers,” Villegas said.

Illinois real estate laws will change in 2025, including the requirement for written brokerage agreements.

What this means for you and the industry

While broker compensation no longer will be displayed on the MLS, Ellis doesn’t expect a change in how brokers are compensated. She predicts buyers will ask sellers for a “closing cost credit,” which buyers then use to pay their agent. Homebuyers also can ask the seller to pay their broker — reverting to the traditional model.

Both those scenarios emphasize that the buyer commission comes from the home transaction, Ellis said.

“It doesn’t mean that [buyers] are going to have to come out of pocket with money that they never did before,” she said.

Buyers and sellers also could elect to separately pay their own broker, raising concern among some real estate agents about how the rules could affect first-time buyers.

How will first-time buyers be affected?

First-time buyers, including those from underrepresented groups, can have trouble with financing their first home and having to pay a broker’s commission could act as an extra hurdle, according to Brian Kwilosz of EXIT Realty. Kwilosz said EXIT is watching the impact the changes will have on first-time buyers.

Lutalo McGee, owner of the real estate firm Ani World, plans to stress that cooperative compensation remains an option for new buyers even if it’s negotiated differently. Ani Real Estate, under the umbrella of McGee’s Ani World, has the bulk of its sales on the South Side.

“A lot of clients, at least that I service and my brokers [service], are those that have struggled with down payments and closing costs in the past,” McGee said. “We’re going to be actively monitoring to see what the impact of these changes are going to be.”

Several real estate agents said they don’t think the changes will affect home prices. The housing market is driven by supply and demand, Silver said, and with a dearth of housing across the region, he doesn’t think home prices will go down “anytime soon.”

It’s possible buyer commission rates could drop as agents and their clients have more conversations about compensation. But Ellis predicts agents will complete more transactions after Saturday’s changes take effect.

“I think that good real estate agents will actually increase their income,” Ellis said. “We’ve got to do what’s right for the consumer and what they want and bring real, tangible value to them.”





This article was originally published by a
chicago.suntimes.com . Read the Original article here. .


Homebuyers face a changing housing market this weekend as major shifts to how real estate agents are paid take effect.

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) groundbreaking new commission-sharing agreement will end the common practice of home sellers automatically covering the fees for real estate agents on both sides of the transaction. The new rules start on Saturday.

The agreement is the result of the settlement of a series of lawsuits brought over the past few years challenging the long-held practice of splitting the sales commission between the seller and buyer agent. Plaintiffs in the legal battles, primarily home sellers who paid both agents, claimed commission sharing, also known as cooperative compensation, artificially inflated the cost of a home sale.

Although the NAR was the main defendant in several cases, other major brokerages, including Keller Williams and RE/MAX, were also named co-defendants. With the NAR settlement, however, most of these lawsuits will have been settled, clearing the way for a change in how realtor fees are negotiated.

Now, real estate agents are prohibited from advertising shared commissions on local databases, called multiple listings services (MLS), and buyers will instead have to negotiate their agent’s fees before they start viewing homes.

Ads by Money. We may be compensated if you click this ad.Ad

How will the NAR agreement change agent commissions?

Even though these fees have always been negotiable, most homeowners entering into a listing agreement with a realtor have typically paid between 5% and 6% commission on the sales price, which was split between the agents representing the seller and buyer. The ultimate goal of the lawsuits was to reduce this percentage, thereby saving sellers money.

Since the settlement announcement in March, there has been a slight decrease in the typical percentage paid to buyers’ agents. According to a report from Redfin, the typical seller is paying the buyer’s agent a 2.55% commission through the period ending in mid-July. By comparison, the typical commission paid in January was 2.62%. The question is whether the new commission model will accelerate the decline in fees paid.

Marty Green, principal at the Texas-based law firm Polunsky, Beitel, Green, believes that once the agreement goes into effect, commission changes will remain modest — at least for now.

“It’s not likely they are going to turn a switch on August 17th, and suddenly everything’s going to be different,” Green says. The immediate effect will be more transparency between agents and their clients, emphasizing the buyer’s side of the commission discussions and whether sellers want to keep splitting commissions. Some sellers may decide to continue the practice to make their homes more attractive to buyers.

Ads by Money. We may be compensated if you click this ad.Ad

Who benefits most from the change in how real estate agents are paid?

Although the settlement is meant to benefit all sellers and buyers, that may not be the case, according to Daniel Smith, founder of Keepingly, a home management platform. If the traditional model of commission sharing is fundamentally altered, it could simply lead to more upfront costs for buyers.

“For many consumers, particularly those with limited financial flexibility, this could make homeownership more challenging,” Smith says.

Aside from home sellers, who can decide if they want to continue footing the bill for the buyer’s agent and how much they are willing to pay, the other winners in this scenario are likely to be high-income buyers. These clients have the means to cover the costs of their own agent’s commission and may be more likely to shop around and negotiate agent fees.

On the other hand, the agreement could increase the challenges low-income and first-time buyers face in an already difficult housing market. Part of the settlement agreement includes a provision that buyers must sign a contract with their agents before touring any potential homes. That contract will likely include language that outlines how the buyer will be responsible for paying the agent’s commission if the seller decides not to.

If buyers have to pay for their agent’s representation, that cash needs to be paid upfront with the down payment and closing costs or somehow rolled into the mortgage, increasing the borrowed amount and the monthly payments along with it.

The increased cost of representation could also lead some buyers to hire an inexperienced agent or forego representation altogether, which could put them at a disadvantage when negotiating a home price or concession.

It will take time to measure exactly how much change the agreements will bring about to agent commissions. For now, it’s more important than ever that sellers and buyers understand the potential impacts of the settlement. For sellers, Green says, this means deciding whether to pay the buyer’s agent and for buyers, how to structure their offer in a way that makes financial sense.

Ads by Money. We may be compensated if you click this ad.Ad

More from Money:

8 Best Mortgage Lenders of 2024

4 Signs You Need a New Real Estate Agent

Rents Are Falling — Here Are the Cities With the Biggest Drops



This article was originally published by a money.com . Read the Original article here. .


How new real estate rules are set to reshape home buying and selling across the U.S. – CBS News

Watch CBS News

Starting Aug. 17, new regulations will change how real estate commissions are handled, potentially lowering costs for homebuyers and sellers. Under the new rules, buyers and sellers will have the opportunity to negotiate commissions directly with their agents, a shift that could impact everyone involved in the real estate market.

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.

Not Now
Turn On



This article was originally published by a www.cbsnews.com . Read the Original article here. .


EDINA, Minn. — The experience of buying or selling a home is changing. A recent National Association of Realtors settlement now requires buyers and sellers to negotiate house sale commissions, including who pays and how much.

A recent overhaul changed the way realtors get paid to help people buy and sell their homes. It’s part of a $418 million settlement announced in March between a nationwide group of homeowners and the National Association of Realtors.

“For consumers, it’s going to be more transparent and it really should be a smooth process,” said Jamar Hardy, president of Minneapolis Area Realtors. “Historically, a seller’s agent charged home sellers a fee, usually 5% or 6%, which was then split with the buyer’s agent. On a $500,000 home that would be $30,000 in commission.”

Lawsuits alleged the standard practice violated antitrust laws, though the association has long argued that the commissions were always negotiable.

Moving forward, buyers who previously didn’t have to pay a commission to their realtor who helped them purchase a home will be expected to pay for the service. Sellers will have to pay for their agent but will no longer have to pay for the buyer’s agent.

Listing agents and sellers will be prohibited from including offers of compensation to buyer agents on the multiple listings services, better known as the MLS.

“If sellers aren’t offering payouts right up front, that negotiation is going to happen at a time of offer, so we’ll see a little change there because again, that offer of compensation won’t be visible to us anymore,” said Hardy.

Real estate commissions in Minneapolis have fallen minimally since March, after the announcement of the settlement. It fell from 2.6% in March to 2.56% in mid-July.

Analysts with TD Cowen expect the settlement could reduce realtor commissions by 25% to 50%. Another change requires buyers’ agents to discuss their compensation upfront.

“I think that’s going to be the biggest change for both consumers and agents. It’s not just allowing somebody to walk through that house because we have a showing, let ’em run through really quick to see things,” said Hardy.

There are 22,000 real estate agents in Minnesota. Hardy says some may leave the business because of the changes,but others will thrive.

“I think competition is going to win out in the end, and people are going to truly know what we do for a living and understand what they’re paying for,” said Hardy.

The new rule changes the National Association of Realtors agreed to as part of the settlement take effect on Saturday.

More from CBS News



This article was originally published by a www.cbsnews.com . Read the Original article here. .


First, before a seller may show a residential property or a buyer may tour a property, real estate professionals and their clients will be required to enter into a written representation agreement outlining the terms of realtors’ compensation, said Ali Whitley, president of Ohio Realtors.

Written representation agreements must include an expiration date, information on fair housing and blockbusting laws, whether the relationship is exclusive or nonexclusive, and terms of compensation, according to House Bill 466, which was recently approved in addition to the settlement agreement.

ExploreNumber of homes sold, sale prices kept rising in first half of 2024

Stephen Brobeck, a senior fellow with Consumer Federation of America, told this news outlet that the lawsuit and resulting ruling is based on the fact that for the last century, the real estate industry has effectively set commission rates.

“DOJ (the Department of Justice) has been working for 80 years to try to force the industry to create a more price-competitive market … but the real watershed was the jury decision in the combined Sitzer and Moehrl cases,” he said. “A jury found the the industry defendants guilty of price fixing and awarded the Missouri plaintiffs over $5 billion including triple damages.”

For decades, real estate agents have typically been paid a certain percentage of the sales price once the home is sold. A typical agent’s commission has been 6% of the sale price, split between the agents or companies representing the buyer and seller.

Brobeck said in the new system, it is important for people who intend to buy or sell a home to carefully select an agent ahead of time who is both honest and competent. Before deciding on an agent, the buyers and sellers should get a proposed contract document from the agent and have an opportunity to read and understand it. He said the agent should be willing to discuss the contract before the buyer or seller selects them.

“If an agent will not present a readable contract that is consumer-centric, a consumer should look for another agent,” Brobeck said. “And it’s that refusal by consumers to work with agents presenting unreadable contracts that will persuade the industry to improve them.”

Second change: Compensation

Real estate professionals will be prohibited from offering cooperative compensation on listings on multiple listing service (MLS) databases, Whitley said. That includes all listing types that appear on the MLS, including residential, commercial and rentals.

“What that means is that if the buyer’s broker is authorized by the buyer to accept commission compensation from a different party than the buyer, then they’ll need to just get that communication directly from the listing agent or the seller,” Whitley said. “What a buyer should expect moving forward is that we have a written representation agreement that will delineate what the services of their broker or agent is to them, and the fee for those services. So prior to showing any homes or to touring any homes, they will have a written representation agreement with their agent.”

Buyers and sellers can still negotiate compensation arrangements directly with real estate professionals outside of the MLS. Additionally, sellers may continue to offer buyer concessions, such as closing cost contributions on the MLS.

Whitley said the changes are meant to be transparent and provide clarity to both the sellers and buyers in the transaction.

“Instead of there being a perceived situation of a listing broker determining what will happen moving forward with a buyer’s broker, it will be very clear that it is the seller and the agent are having a conversation and determining that the seller is or is not willing to offer cooperative compensation,” she said. “And if they are willing to offer cooperative compensation, what is that amount that they are wiling to offer.”

ExploreOwners of Pet Wants business plan to open downtown Miamisburg storefront

On the buyer’s side “it’s clarifying that the buyer’s agent provides services to the buyer … and they advocate on behalf of the buyer,” Whitley said. “And so the written representation agreement will delineate what those services are, and then also what the fee is that that broker is charging for those services. And then the buyer and the buyer’s broker will be able to negotiate from there what that commission is that will be paid and how it will be paid.”

Whitley said the compensation obligation can be satisfied through the purchase agreement, if the seller is willing to offer it.

“It also can be negotiated between buyer and seller during the time of a purchase agreement, or the buyer could say ‘I prefer to pay my own agent because they are working on my behalf … or any combination of those things can happen,” she said.

Kelly McCormick, president of Dayton Realtors, said commissions were “always negotiable.”

“Now, creating that clarity between buyers and sellers is something that the real estate industry and agents will be doing every single day,” McCormick said. “There’s always going to be a cost to sell and a cost to buy. Those costs are always provided, as far as a lender of good faith estimate, and now both buyer and seller will have potentially more clarity in how that cost impacts their purchase and their sale.”

ExploreBig Lots to close 315 stores, including sites in Montgomery, Butler counties

Austin Castro, a team leader at Coldwell Banker Heritage, said part of the impact from the changes could come as a result of people signing agreements with buyers agents up front, as opposed to down the road.

“What I think that means is when someone wants to sell their house, there was always a big interview process?” he said. “They’d call three or four different agents. They’d sit down and interview them. They’d talk about it, you know, and then they sign an agreement to sell their house with whoever they thought was best fit for the job. I think we’re going to start to see that now with with buyer’s representation.”

Castro said buyers, when choosing an agent, used to go with the first person they met, someone they met at an open house or a friend of a friend.

“Now I think it’s going to be a little bit more of a interview process for buyers representation because people are signing those agreements up front, disclosing ‘Hey, this is what my agent makes on this transaction,’ so I think that’s probably where we’re going to see a biggest change is going to be maybe buyers putting a little more thought on who they’re going to have represent them,” Castro said.

ExploreFuyao raid: Who owns raided properties and what neighbors have seen





This article was originally published by a www.daytondailynews.com . Read the Original article here. .


New rules to how homes are bought and sold could mean an average savings of more than $50,000 to Peninsula home sellers. Photo courtesy Getty Images.

Big changes are coming to how homes are bought and sold beginning Aug. 17 when new rules roll out that will revamp how Realtors get paid commission. 

The changes, which are part of a $418 million court settlement that the trade group the National Association of Realtors announced in March, put an end to the decades-old practice requiring home sellers to pay 5% to 6% of a home’s purchase price to cover the commission for both the listing agent and the buyer’s agent.

For sellers on the Midpeninsula, where the median price for a single-family home is above $2 million – this means an average savings of more than $50,000 in commission fees.

The sudden death of the 6% commission

The Sitzer/Burnett buyer-broker commission lawsuit – a class-action lawsuit filed in Kansas City, Mo., last October on behalf of 260,000 home sellers in the Midwest over the National Association of Realtors’ commission rules – paved the way for the new regulations that will affect sellers, buyers and agents nationwide. 

A federal jury found the National Association of Realtors and some residential brokerages liable for nearly $1.8 billion in damages after determining they conspired to inflate commissions by forcing sellers to make non-negotiable offers of compensation to the buyer’s agent for listings on the Multiple Listing Service

What buyers should know

If you are a buyer and your agent is using an Multiple Listing Service, you will need to sign a written agreement with your agent before touring a home so you understand exactly what services will be provided and for how much. Written agreements are required for both in-person and live virtual home tours and must include: 

The amount of compensation the real estate agent will receive and how this amount will be determined. Is it a flat fee, a percent of the home cost or an hourly rate?  Compensation cannot be open-ended or determined by “whatever commission amount” the seller is offering to give to the buyer’s agent. 

A statement indicating that the agent is prohibited from receiving compensation for brokerage services from any source that exceeds the amount or rate agreed to in the agreement with the buyer

A statement indicating that broker fees and commissions are fully negotiable and not set by law. 

Information from the National Association of Realtors.

To resolve the litigation claims against the trade association and more than one million Realtor members, the National Association of Realtors agreed to make changes to its commission process as part of the $418 million settlement agreement.

The association, however, has stressed that commissions have always been negotiable and continues to deny any wrongdoing by its members in regard to commissions. 

“NAR does not dictate commissions. This was true before the settlement agreement and remains true once the practice changes go into effect,” according to a statement by the association.  

What the changes mean to buyers and sellers

Under the new system, the most significant change is how buyers’ agents are paid. While the seller can choose to pay a buyer’s agent, the rules make it crystal clear that sellers are no longer required to offer any compensation to a buyer’s agent. 

Buyers now will be required to negotiate directly with their own agents and must enter into signed agreements that outline how they will compensate their agent (flat fee, hourly rate or other arrangements), the amount they will pay and what services they want their agent to provide. Written agreements will be required before a buyer and their agent can do any in-person or live virtual home tours. Buyers do not need a written agreement if they are just speaking to an agent at an open house or asking them about their services.

There are also changes to how and where real estate professionals may communicate with each other about offers of compensation. These offers are no longer allowed on Multiple Listing Service platforms, which are private databases created, maintained and paid for by real estate professionals and provide property listings to Zillow, Trulia, Realtor.com and others.  

Individual agents and real estate companies, however, will still be able to reference compensation on their own websites. 

“These changes will bring more transparency and more clarity for home sellers and buyers,” said Jennifer Branchini, regional vice president of the National Association of Realtors for California, Hawaii and Guam. Branchini, who served as last year’s president of the California Association of Realtors, manages the Compass real estate office in Pleasanton.

Talk of the industry

The lawsuit and the National Association of Realtors’ subsequent agreement are the talk of the industry — but little of it on the record. Numerous local Realtors, the Silicon Valley Association of Realtors, the Sunnyvale office of MLS, and the Real Estate Research Institute of Hartford, Conn., all either declined comment or did not return messages for this story.

Michael Repka, CEO and general counsel of DeLeon Realty of Palo Alto, had plenty to say, however. He said the 5% to 6% commission structure — including sellers paying 2.5% to agents representing buyers — has been the norm throughout the industry since he joined it in the 1990s.

He said a recent analysis of home sales in Palo Alto valued at between $2 million and $10 million, revealed that nearly 95% of them included the 2.5% fee paid by sellers to agents representing buyers.

Repka said he believes the rule changes will be good for the real estate market. With sellers now looking at paying a commission of only 2.5% to 3.5% on any given transaction, Repka said this could persuade more long-time Midpeninsula homeowners to sell their homes. That, in turn, could put more badly needed housing inventory onto what has been an historically tight market in recent years.

“This new situation results in something that is more fair to the seller,” he said.

The new rules still allow sellers to offer some compensation to the agents of buyers, but the amount paid, if any, is now up to the seller, Repka added. 

“Typically, sellers had no option to pay less than the total commission. Even if the buyer’s agent’s involvement was minimal, or if the buyer discovered the property on their own (without the assistance of an agent), the listing agent retained both sides of the commission,” Repka said. 

This practice, he explained, has been used to encourage agents to point buyers toward properties that offer them higher commission rates. Sellers who didn’t offer 2.5% commission to a buyer’s agent, allegedly risked having their listing “blacklisted” by some real estate agents, according to Repka. 

“In essence, buyers will now have access to information about all homes available for sale, irrespective of whether the seller offers minimal or even no compensation to the buyer’s agent,” Repka said. 

According to the settlement facts outlined on the National Association of Realtors’ website, the association already had MLS policies in place regarding the non-filtering (or removal) of listings based on compensation. The new rules amend that policy “for clarification purposes and to ensure consistency with the proposed settlement agreement.”

Whether the 6% commission has been a longstanding and common practice, depends on whom one speaks to in the industry. 

One veteran Midpeninsula agent, who preferred not to be named, said 6% commissions have never been demanded across the board by agents locally, adding commissions are typically negotiated between home sellers and Realtors — and discounted commission rates are fairly common “to keep transactions alive.”

She said it’s not unusual for agents to “absorb costs” at times for sellers and buyers.

While the new rules provide more transparency and give sellers more options, some say the homebuying process may become more challenging for first-time buyers. 

“At a time when home prices and mortgage interest rates are higher, these new rules place an additional financial burden on homebuyers, particularly first-time homebuyers who are already struggling to come up with a down payment to purchase a home.” Eileen Giorgi, president of the Silicon Valley Association of Realtors, said in a news release from the association. 

New California requirements in the works

On the buyers’ side, Branchini, regional vice president of the National Association of Realtors, said the issue also has attracted the attention of lawmakers in Sacramento. The California Legislature currently is considering a bill that would require written agreements between agents and homebuyers. It would enshrine the requirement in state law, complementing the new industry directives.

Mantill Williams, Washington, D.C.-based vice president of communications for the National Association of Realtors, said 18 states currently have such laws, with several more, including California, now proposing similar legal requirements.

Assembly Bill 2992, authored by Assembly member Stephanie Nguyen, D-Elk Grove, would mandate buyer/broker written agreements — already required for sellers and brokers. The bill is still working its way through legislative committees.

Despite the National Association of Realtors’  widespread coverage, the association’s agreement does not yet cover all brokers in the industry. Officials of HomeServices of America Inc. of Edina, Minn., are still litigating the lawsuit, known as the Sitzer-Burnett vs. National Association of Realtors case. HomeServices of America is the parent company of Intero Real Estate Services, which has local offices in Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Los Altos and Redwood City.

David Goll is a freelance writer who regularly contributes to the Real Estate section.

– Linda Taaffe contributed to this article.



This article was originally published by a www.paloaltoonline.com . Read the Original article here. .


The National Association of Realtors (NAR) requires the implementation of two policy changes no later than Saturday, August 17.

San Luis Obispo County real estate agent Christa Lowry explained the two changes taking place.

“The first change is that buyers will not be able to enter a home without a written and signed buyer’s representation agreement with their buyer’s agent,” Lowry said.

That agreement negotiates a percentage of the sale the buyer will pay their agent. Prior to this rule, buyers could opt out of paying the buyer a commission.

“They had the option to not, but it was standard that they did,” Lowry said.

She added that while this new change requires the buyer to pay the buyer’s agent a commission, that commission fee is agreed upon by both parties.

“It’s a negotiable amount. That’s the most important thing to know,” Lowry said.

The second change prevents a listing agent from disclosing an agent’s commission or concession on the Multiple Listing Service. Instead, buyers will need to contact the listing agent directly about commission or concession fees.

“Buyers used to be able to call an agent and say, ‘Hey, I’d like to see five properties.’ There [was] no written agreement. There [was] no talk about commission or concession,” Lowry said. “Now they have to sit down and have that conversation with a buyer’s agent.”

Jenny Heinzen works as a broker for Vineyard Professional Real Estate, a luxury real estate firm in Paso Robles.

She said most of these changes involve a restructuring of business.

“It’s just kind of a work-around with the paperwork,” Heinzen said.

However, she said first-time home buyers could be impacted by the changes.

“A lot of times first-time home buyers are stretching for payment and if those first-time home buyers are asked to pay their buyer’s agent commission, that affects their down payment capabilities,” she said.

Heinzen noted that those costs can be avoided by structuring agreements differently.

“Our goal on our listings and most of the agents within the county is to get compensated by the seller,” Heinzen said.

She said for those new to buying a home or looking for help navigating these changes, finding the right agent is key.

“It’s going to be really important to work with good, experienced agents who are selling the types of property that you want to buy or sell,” Heinzen said. “Find a good agent and a good agent will educate you.”





This article was originally published by a www.ksby.com . Read the Original article here. .


Aug. 17 will mark major changes for the real estate industry and the rollout of new rules about how Realtors are paid for buying and selling homes.

The changes are coming about because the powerful real estate trade group, the National Association of Realtors, agreed in March to settle lawsuits in which sellers accused the group of running up fees. At the time, the group agreed to pay $418 million in damages, but it also agreed to change the way commission rules work — a change that will go into effect within the week.

In the past, when someone went to buy a home, he or she would typically go out and get representation from a Realtor, and that Realtor’s compensation for his or her services was paid by the seller, according to Stephen O’Connor, chairman of the Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis at George Washington University.

“So typically, a commission on a home, if you had a home for one million dollars and you were selling it, the commission structure would typically be 5% or 6%, out of that 5% or 6%, typically half would go to the listing broker, the person who was actually selling the house for the seller, and the other half would go to the buyer’s agent,” he explained to the Washington Examiner.

The NAR was sued because some people thought that was an unfair payment structure. Still, the NAR has argued that their compensation structures were always negotiable and transparent, O’Connor added.

With the new changes, now when someone wants to buy a house, he or she has to sign an agreement with an agent.

“So no longer is the seller responsible for paying the commission structure or the fees associated with the buyer’s representation,” O’Connor said. “So right now, as of Aug. 17, if I want to go out and I want to buy a house, I’m going to have to negotiate with a real estate agent and sign an agreement for buyer’s representation and negotiate what I’m going to pay out of my own pocket … the fee that that person is going to charge me for their professional services.”

The NAR itself has been optimistic about the new changes. Vince Malta, a member of NAR’s leadership team who previously served as the group’s president, told the Washington Examiner that the written agreement will improve transparency.

“We believe this will help with transparency, a better understanding of the relationship, what are the expectations of the parties, and it has to specify what compensation is expected or will be paid,” Malta said.

Malta said the agreement also makes it so offers of compensation will no longer be allowed on multiple listing services — central databases used by Realtors to share details about homes for sale.

“Those offers of compensation would have to occur off of the MLS, so various ways — another document like in a disclosure package or a phone call, but not on the multiple listing service,” he said.

But it doesn’t preclude an offer of compensation.

“If a seller and listing agent believe that it is in the best interest to sell that home to offer compensation to an agent that is representing a buyer, then offers of compensation could still be made,” Malta said.

The $418 million settlement and rules change came after a federal jury last October found major real estate groups liable and ordered them to pay $1.8 billion in damages as part of the antitrust lawsuit that accused them of colluding to inflate the rates of commissions.

The jury, based in Kansas City, Missouri, found that not only NAR but also Keller Williams Realty and HomeServices of America conspired to inflate and maintain high commissions artificially.

O’Conner said he doesn’t think this will greatly affect home sales volume. The housing market has been closely watched the past few years given soaring mortgage rates and home prices.

As of Wednesday, the average rate on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage was at 6.52%, according to Mortgage News Daily, which tracks daily changes in rates. That is down from a peak last year of above 8%, although it is still higher than in the years prior to the pandemic.

“I don’t think it’s going to affect home sales at all,” O’Connor said. “I think people are going to sell their home when they’re ready to sell their home. People are going to buy a home when they’re ready to buy a home. This is just different in terms of who gets to represent who and, more specifically, who’s paying who.”

On the agent side, O’Connor said it is yet to be seen how it will shake out, for instance, whether the change will affect the total membership size of the NAR. But he said it will be harder for agents to make money because of the change.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Others think this will be a big change that may be challenging for realtors.

“This is a grand social experiment in an industry at scale,” Leo Pareja, CEO of eXp Realty, told CNN. “I’m bracing my agents for what I call the ‘messy middle.’ I fully expect a lot of confusion.”



This article was originally published by a www.washingtonexaminer.com . Read the Original article here. .


WALNUT CREEK, Calif. (KGO) — The experience of buying or selling a home is going to be different than transactions in the past. A recent National Association of Realtors class action settlement agreement has laid out new rules that will now bring the buyer and seller into negotiations over commissions on the sale of a house – negotiating who pays commission and how much is paid.

“Today is the day that on the MLS any indication of compensation commission is eliminated, you can’t even look at historical data,” Tricia Thomas, the CEO of the Bay East Association of Realtors said.

Realtors say that will make it more complicated for agents who now will have to involve potential buyers and sellers in signing new more complicated paperwork.

“So the buyer and seller are looped into the transaction more so we’re able to be more transparent with them about compensation,” Barbara Clemons, president of the Bay East Association of Realtors said, “There will be more forms for the buyer and seller to fill out.”

That will be apparent when visiting an open house – buyers will be asked to sign forms and if they don’t have an agent representing them; they might not be able to get additional information about a property without an agent.

MORE: San Jose becomes 1st in CA to allow property owners to sell ADUs

Buyers will have to negotiate how much they are willing to pay the agent representing them. But sellers could incentivize a sale by offering to pay all or a portion of the buyer’s agent’s commission.

David Stark with the Bay East Association of Realtors said, “It’s the biggest decision of your life and it’s probably going to be intimidating regardless of these changes but the fact that there’s going to be so much more information available, hopefully that’ll take care of some of the anxiety people will be having about real estate transactions.”

How these changes will affect commissions or the market is still a big unknown.

“There is no crystal ball. I don’t believe this is a factor on its own that’s going to significantly influence housing prices,” Thomas said.

But it will be a learning curve for everyone looking to buy or sell a home now.

Copyright © 2024 KGO-TV. All Rights Reserved.



This article was originally published by a abc7news.com . Read the Original article here. .


CHICAGO (WLS) — Things are about to change when it comes to buying and selling a home.

ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

Starting Saturday, August 17, 2024, new rules will take effect regarding real estate commissions.

The change comes as part of a settlement of class action lawsuits filed by homeowners against the National Association of Realtors.

Those lawsuits claimed homeowners were forced to pay inflated commissions to sell their homes.

The National Association of Realtors has denied any wrongdoing.

“As a result of the NAR settlement, buyers are going to be asked to sign a representation agreement with the brokerage where their agent works,” real estate Lawyer Heather Neveu with Chilton Yambert Porter LLP said. “It’s going to be an agreement where the buyer is agreeing to compensate the realtor for the work they’re performing.

New rules will take effect regarding real estate commissions, after a settlement was reached against the National Association of Realtors.

Co-Founder of Weinberg Choi Residential Tommy Choi said this type of agreement is not new.

“It’s something that’s always been around, a buyer-broker agreement,” Choi said. “It’s something most real estate agents have practice. Now, it’s just something that’s going to become even more clear. And part of the process when it comes to homebuying.”

New rules will take effect regarding real estate commissions, after a settlement was reached against the National Association of Realtors.

“I think it’s going to be a short-term thing because I don’t think it was wisely used,” Neveu said. “I think there might just be a learning curve involved as buyers are going to be now across the board shown this agreement. The responsibility for paying their realtor is now going to shift to the buyer where before an agent representing a buyer was able to honestly tell their client you don’t have to pay me.”

She added that buyers are now going to have to learn about their options concerning how realtors are paid.

Another change is the offers of compensation, which can no longer take place on the MLS.

Choi explained there’s been a lot of misinformation about these changes.

“The biggest thing is that consumers think commissions go away. Sellers don’t have to pay the buyers. They never really had to. It’s in their best interest because if they don’t it limits the buyer pool. And the biggest challenge this could pose in that situation, is affordability for a buyer,” Choi said.

Copyright © 2024 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.



This article was originally published by a abc7chicago.com . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It