Tag

Homes

Browsing


The share of new homes with patios dipped below 61% for the first time since 2019, according to NAHB tabulation of data from the Survey of Construction (conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau with partial funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development). Of the roughly 940,00 single-family homes started during 2025, 60.5% came with patios. This is down from 61.8% in 2024 and marks the lowest percentage since the 59.6% recorded in 2019.

Historically, the share of homes with patios was increasing every year from the end of the Great Recession through 2023 (except in 2015, when it was unchanged). Over the past two years, however, the trend reversed itself, and the share of new homes with patios has started to decline.

Historically, the share of homes with patios was increasing every year from the end of the Great Recession through 2023 (except in 2015, when it was unchanged). Over the past two years, however, the trend reversed itself, and the share of new homes with patios has started to decline. During that time, the geographic pattern of patios on new homes has remained stable for the most part, but in 2025 the share of new homes with patios increased substantially—from 14% in 2024 to 26%—in New England. New England has traditionally been the Census division where patios on new homes are least common, but in 2025 New England edged ahead of the Middle Atlantic, where the percentage held steady at 23%.  At the high end, the top three divisions for new-home patios remained the same in 2025 as they had been the previous year: the West South Central (77%), Mountain Division (74%), and South Atlantic (66%).

Additional detail on the characteristics of new-home patios is available from the Annual Builder Practices Survey (BPS) conducted by Home Innovation Research Labs.

For the U.S. as a whole, the 2026 BPS report (based on homes built in 2025 like the SOC-based statistics cited above) shows that the average size of a new-home patio is about 320 square feet, but with considerable geographic variation. The average is well over 400 square feet in the adjacent East North Central and East South Central divisions. New home patios are considerably smaller on the other side of the Mississippi River, with an average of under 200 square feet in the West South Central, and only a little over 200 square feet in the West North Central division.

In most parts of the country, builders use more poured concrete than any other material in new home patios. Across all nine Census divisions, poured concrete accounts for over 60% of new home patios on a square-foot basis. The only real counterexample continues to be the New England division, where concrete pavers and natural stone each account for more patio square footage than poured concrete, and brick pavers account for almost as much.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


New home sales rose in the second quarter but were lower than a year ago, according to the U.S. Census Bureau New Residential Sales release. The share of homes purchased with conventional financing remains high, while the share purchased with Federal Housing Administration (FHA) financing rose to its highest level since early 2021. The share of new homes purchased with cash fell to its lowest share since 2007.

An estimated 170,000 new homes were sold in the second quarter, up from 165,000 in the first but down from 178,000 a year ago. By financing, 123,000 were conventionally financed. Conventional mortgage loans are loans not classified as a VA loan or FHA loan. FHA financed sales were estimated at 33,000. FHA mortgage loans are insured by the Federal Housing Administration. VA financed sales were estimated at 9,000. VA mortgage loans are guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Cash sales were estimated at 6,000 houses in the second quarter.

As a share of homes sold, 71.9% were conventionally financed, 19.3% of FHA financed, 5.3% were VA financed, and 3.5% were cash purchased. The cash purchase share was the lowest since the fourth quarter of 2007, when 3.4% of homes sold were cash purchases.

Sales Price by Financing

The median sales price of a new home in the second quarter was $410,700, higher than the first quarter ($408,500) but down from a year ago ($416,100). The highest median sales price by financing type was for cash purchases at $467,100, which was closely followed by VA financing at $457,500. Conventional financing has a median sales price of $430,700, while the median sales price for FHA financing was $366,700.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Vinyl siding was the most used principle exterior wall material for homes started construction in 2025. This material held just over a quarter share of homes, surpassing stucco for the second time since 2018. The declining share for stucco reflected the slowdown for home building in parts of the Sun Belt.

For homes started in 2025, 27.7% had vinyl siding as the principal exterior wall material. Vinyl siding was followed closely by stucco at 24.1%, and by fiber cement siding (such as Hardiplank or Hardiboard) at 22.6%. Each of these materials held about a quarter share of the market, with another sliver held by brick or brick veneer at 16.8%. Far smaller shares of single-family homes started last year had wood or wood products (5.9%) as the principal exterior wall material, while all other materials had a less than 2% share.

As shown in the graph above, while vinyl has historically held a much larger share, at a high of almost 40% in 2001, the share fell rapidly between 2010 to 2015 by over 10 percentage points. However, this share has remained fairly steady since, at around 25%. Meanwhile, stucco rose rapidly from 17% in 2010 until recently peaking at 28% in 2021.  

However, the strongest trend has been the growing popularity in fiber cement siding, growing in share by almost 20 percentage points in the past 25 years. Also notable is the decline of brick siding, from almost a quarter of homes in 2012, to just under 17% in 2025.

As shown in the dashboard above, exterior material preferences varied by both home size and price. Vinyl siding had the largest market share among smaller homes (under 2,000 square feet), while fiber cement was most common in larger homes (3,000 square feet or more). Stucco was widely used across all home sizes but was most prevalent in midsized homes (2,000–2,999 square feet).

A majority of homes started in 2025 were priced between $250,000-$499,000, where vinyl was most prevalent. Meanwhile, stucco was the most common material in home priced above $500,000.  Interestingly, although brick siding was most common in lower-priced homes, it also had a relatively high market share among larger homes. This apparent contradiction highlights the most important factor influencing exterior material choices: geography.

Climate, regional building practices, material availability, and architectural styles create substantial differences in siding preferences across the country. In 2025, brick or brick veneer was the most common exterior siding material in the West South Central division at 54%. As the South tends to build larger and more affordable homes, this helps explain why brick siding is associated with both larger and lower-priced homes. 

In 2025, vinyl siding was the most widely used primary exterior material in five out of nine census divisions. Vinylsidingwas used on 73% of the new homes started in the Middle Atlantic, 72% in New England, 71% in the East North Central, 47% in the West North Central and the East South Central at 39%. Notably, this was the first time since 2020 that vinyl siding surpassed brick siding in the East South Central division.

Stucco was the most used primary exterior wall material in the Pacific and South Atlantic divisions in 2025, at 65% and 33% of the new single-family homes started in those areas. Fiber Cement siding slightly surpassed stucco this year in the Mountain division with a 42% market share for the first time based on data available back to 2000.

The highest market share for wood exterior siding was in the West North Central division at 23% of homes started in 2025. Meanwhile, stone, concrete block, and other siding materials held similary small shares across all divisions.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


In 2025, approximately 47,000 homes were built in age-restricted communities, representing 3.45% of all housing starts. According to the Census Bureau’s Survey of Construction, roughly two-thirds of these homes (30,000) were single-family units, while the remaining 17,000 were multifamily units. 

In 2009, during the depths of the housing downturn, builders started only 17,000 homes in age-restricted communities. The volume of construction increased steadily until reaching 60,000 age-restricted starts (roughly evenly split between single-family and multifamily) in 2018. Starts declined during the pandemic but rebounded in 2021 and 2022. Since then, age-restricted construction has fallen along with the broader decline in overall housing starts. 

Age-restricted single-family homes accounted for 3.16% of all single-family housing starts in 2025, unchanged from the previous two years. This share has remained relatively stable since 2009. In contrast, the share of age-restricted multifamily units increased from 3.11% in 2024 to 4.09% in 2025. Even with this increase, the current multifamily share remains well below its peak of roughly 14% in 2010. 

Age-restricted single-family homes carried a noticeable price premium in 2025. The median sales price reached $523,000, about 27% higher than the $412,000 median for non-age-restricted homes. Age-restricted homes tend to be larger, averaging 2,500 square feet versus 2,100 square feet. However, the price per square foot remained elevated at $166.20, compared to $153.30 for non-age-restricted homes. 

Lot values may help explain part of the price difference. Age-restricted homes were typically built on more expensive lots, with a median value of $64,000 compared to $60,000 for non-age-restricted homes. Despite the higher price, these lots were slightly smaller, averaging 0.19 acres versus 0.20 acres. 



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


In 2024, the number of second homes in the U.S. was 6.2 million, accounting for 4.3% of the nation’s housing stock, according to NAHB estimates. This reflects a modest decline from 2022, when the number reached 6.5 million. This decline suggests some cooling following the pandemic-era surge in second home demand.

Despite the recent decline, second homes remain highly concentrated in a few states. Florida had the largest stock of second homes, with 943,881 units accounting for 15.2% of the national total. Overall, half of the nation’s second homes are located in just eight states: Florida, California, New York, Texas, Michigan, North Carolina, Arizona, and Pennsylvania.

A closer look at county-level data shows that the concentration of second homes is not simply restricted to conventional locations like beachfront areas. In total, 738 counties across all 50 states had second homes making up at least 10% of the local housing stock. Only Washington D.C. was the exception, reporting a second home share of 1.7%. Moreover, 272 counties—around 8% of all counties nationwide—had second homes accounting for at least 20% of housing units.

In some areas, second homes dominate the local housing market. Counties where at least half of their housing stock is second homes were widely spread over in fourteen states. Of these counties, there were three counties in Colorado, two counties in Utah, California, Massachusetts, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, and one county each in Alaska, Idaho, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, and New York. These national patterns are shown in the interactive map below.

Counties with more than 25,000 second homes are mostly located in or near metropolitan areas.  The top ten counties with the most second homes account for around 11% of second home stocks, most of which are in Arizona, Florida, California, Massachusetts, and New York. Of the top 10 counties regarding absolute numbers of second homes, only two counties (Barnstable County, Massachusetts, and Collier County, Florida) had more than 20% of their housing stock in second homes.

In terms of methodology, this analysis focuses on the number and location of second homes that would qualify for the home mortgage interest deduction by individuals and uses the Census Bureau’s 2024 American Community Survey (ACS). It does not account for homes held primarily for investment or business purposes.

NAHB estimates are based on the definition used for home mortgage interest deduction: a second home is a non-rental property that is not classified as taxpayer’s principal residence. Examples could be: (1) a home that used to be a primary residence due to a move or a period of simultaneous ownership of two homes due to a move; (2) a home under construction for which the eventual homeowner acts as the builder and obtains a construction loan (Treasury regulations permit up to 24 months of interest deductibility for such construction loans); or (3) a non-rental seasonal or vacation residence. However, homes under construction are not included in this analysis because the ACS does not collect data on units under construction.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .



We all have friends or family members who live in tidy, well-kept homes despite having full, busy lives. No matter what the occasion, nothing appears to be out of place. You might wonder how seemingly ordinary people with jobs, partners, children and pets can maintain a tranquil, clutter-free environment.

As a professional organizer, I work with people who have a wide variety of personalities, and I see closets, drawers, cabinets, basements, garages and even spaces under beds. Through my intimate observations, I have learned the secrets of maintaining an orderly home, and in this article I share eight with you.

Jennifer Grey Interiors Design & Color SpecialistSave Photo
A special note to those of you who are not naturally organized: Please don’t despair as you read this list. I have yet to meet a person who has implemented all of the ideas perfectly. So pick the strategies that work for you, and forget about the others. Even if you can implement only one or two, you’ll still move closer to your goal of living in a beautifully organized home.

Find a home professional on Houzz

AM Interior DesignSave Photo
1. They Make Decisions Quickly

My clients who successfully maintain organized homes all make decisions quickly. They are good about getting rid of items that they no longer use, and they try to let go of things that they might use … someday. They let go of clothes that no longer fit or are excessively worn. They get rid of expensive clothes that might come back in style someday, because they understand that even if a style does come back, it is usually slightly different. And yes, these clients may need to hire a professional organizer to manage the decluttering and organizing process, but they quickly take suggestions to heart.

OLSON LEWIS + ArchitectsSave Photo
For the majority of my clients, decisive or not, sentimental items and gifts are the hardest things to part with. But decisive people are able to avoid wallowing in the guilt that might surround getting rid of these items. They choose to keep only things they truly love. On that note, they do not save every piece of their child’s art or schoolwork. Instead, they may take pictures of their children’s work and create a beautiful — and compact — photo book from them.

If making decisions quickly does not come naturally to you, try to focus on your goal of living in a clutter-free home. Create a Houzz ideabook and save photos of rooms that inspire you. You may find that the more you practice letting go of things, the easier it gets.

Bethesda ContractingSave Photo
2. They Move Donation and Disposal Items Quickly

Organized people do not let donation and disposal bags linger in their closet, hallway, or garage. Instead, they get these items out of the house in a timely manner. They take bags to a donation drop-off location the same day the bags are filled (confirming first that the site is open). If items are too big for their cars, they schedule a charity pickup as soon as possible. For excess trash, they contact their local waste management company or hauling service for removal.

My most organized clients do not worry about finding the perfect home for their donations or spend excess time trying to offload unwanted items on family members or friends. They move things quickly out of the house so they have a sense of accomplishment that fuels further progress.

If you have a problem moving donation items or trash bags out of your house, try to make it part of the decluttering process. I recommend not finishing the day without deciding how items to be donated and discarded will leave your house.

Eclectic Designs LLCSave Photo
3. They Store Music, Movies, Books and Recipes Electronically

Owning less stuff helps keep a home from becoming cluttered. Many organized people rent or buy music, movies and books from a cloud-based service and store them on electronic devices. They also tend to save recipes to their hard drives instead of owning a multitude of cookbooks. They take pictures of their favorite recipes and search for new ones online.

Of course, electronic storage doesn’t work for everyone. Some of us find turning the paper pages of a good book a total pleasure — one not quite matched by reading a novel on a cold electronic device. Others have extensive vinyl record collections that bring great enjoyment. Choose the suggestions that work for you, and don’t feel any pressure to get rid of something you truly love.

See why you should hire a professional who uses Houzz Pro software

kelly mcguill homeSave Photo
4. They Edit Clothing and Accessories Frequently

Organized people cull their wardrobes regularly. I recommend that you follow their lead and at the end of each season look at your apparel and get rid of anything you haven’t worn. Give yourself permission to toss stained or torn items, to donate ill-fitting or uncomfortable ones, and even to let go of items you simply don’t wear because they are no longer your favorites.

Many people demote clothing to being “house clothing” because they don’t want to make any real decisions. As a result, they end up with a large quantity of clothing they wear only when relaxing at home. I recommend you try to avoid this delay tactic. Instead, allow yourself one to three house outfits and donate the rest.

Also, if you want to keep sentimental clothing such as college sweatshirts, old sports uniforms or concert T-shirts that you really don’t wear, consider removing them from your primary clothing storage spaces and placing them in an attic, a basement or at the back of your closet. Alternatively, you might consider taking photos of sentimental clothing and then letting them go.

Kate Savitch DesignSave Photo
5. They Declutter the Pantry and Refrigerator Regularly

My clients who are organized get rid of old food regularly. To adopt this habit, I recommend you have a regular time — perhaps once a week — when you clean out your fridge and toss wilted vegetables, spoiled fruit and old leftovers. Also, notice what you toss. If you didn’t get around to eating something before it went bad, I recommend you don’t buy that item again for a while, as it may not be top of mind for you to consume.

I also recommend going through your pantry every six months and discarding any stale or expired food. If you have unopened packages or cans of food that you know you won’t eat, consider donating them to a local food bank.

Albertsson Hansen Architecture and Interior DesignSave Photo
6. They Are Mindful of Purchases and Free Samples

Organized people are thoughtful about what they bring into their homes. To be like them, I recommend you consider your storage situation before making a purchase. Ask yourself, “Do I have room?” You might also consider getting rid of one thing for every item you buy. And if you do not have enough space to store large-quantity items from warehouse stores, simply don’t buy them.

Another good tip is to look at what you already own before you shop so that you don’t buy duplicates. For instance, I often see clients with duplicate spices, condiments and sunscreens. Further, try to avoid bringing home free makeup or laundry samples or complimentary notepads and pens, which tend to clutter up drawers. Before you buy any new small appliance, consider whether you have the countertop space for it. Also, try to avoid buying small appliances or gadgets that have only a single purpose, like strawberry hullers. Instead, collect items that can be used for multiple purposes — like paring knives, which you can also use to hull strawberries.

Check out our guide to get started on your home project

Herlong ArchitectsSave Photo
7. They Aren’t Afraid to Outsource Tasks

Many of my organized clients outsource their yard work or housecleaning so they can focus on keeping their home decluttered and organized. They also aren’t afraid to hire a professional home organizer to help them get a handle on the clutter and dispose of unwanted items in the first place. A follow-up appointment every six months with an organizer can help them keep clutter at bay.

I realize that many people do not have the budget to hire outside help, and of course I wouldn’t advocate spending beyond one’s means. However, there are people who do have the financial resources but feel guilty about outsourcing housework or yardwork because they feel they should do it all. If you fall into this category, consider the stress reduction of bringing a housecleaner in every other week. The cost may even be less than a therapy session and may help you feel a sense of calm when you come home after a long day.

Studiolo Design LLCSave Photo
8. They Put Things Away After Each Use

My most organized clients put things away after they have used them — and in fact, putting things away is the best secret for keeping a house tidy.

But it’s also true that many of my clients struggle with putting things away. If you can’t seem to keep up throughout the day or in the evening after you return home from work, consider putting everything away at night before you go to bed. That way, you’ll wake up to a tidier house, and clutter won’t become overwhelming. To help you develop this habit, I recommend reading How to Form New Habits That Keep Your Home Clutter-Free.

Eurodale Developments IncSave Photo
Again, remember that no one is perfect! Most everyone has some part of his or her home that is not organized. For example, many people simply shove clutter into boxes and hide the boxes in the closet before hosting a party. This creates a semblance of organization for guests but may leave you feeling bad about your house. When it comes to organizing, please don’t compare yourself to others. Everyone is unique and has different limitations, whether budget, time, a messy spouse or health problems. And that’s OK.

Still, your home should be a place where you can relax and recharge, and many of us cannot do that with clutter everywhere. So do your best to make your home comfortable without becoming a slave to organization. When your home is reasonably organized, be sure to take time to enjoy it.

Your turn: How do you stay organized at home? Share your tips and advice in the Comments.

More on Houzz
Read more stories
Browse photos for ideas
Find home professionals



This article was originally published by a
www.houzz.com . Read the Original article here. .


In 2023, nearly 6.45 million homes, around 5% of U.S housing stock, were classified as inadequate according to the American Housing Survey (AHS). Of these, 1.65 million homes were classified as severely inadequate, showing significant concerns over housing quality. While this reveals ongoing issues in nation’s housing conditions, it signals probable market growth for remodeling and home improvements in the year ahead.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines physical adequacy based on whether a home meets the basic standard of “a decent home and a suitable living environment”. Homes are severely inadequate if they exhibit major deficiencies, such as exposed wiring, lack of electricity, missing hot or cold running water, or the absence of heating or cooling systems. Additionally, homes with at least five significant structural problems such as water leaks, large open cracks or holes in the floor also belong to this category.  Moderately inadequate homes have three or four significant structural issues, or have problems such as incomplete kitchen facilities, lack of vented heating equipment, or prolonged toilet breakdowns.

Housing inadequacy has remained a persistent issue over the past decade, shown in Figure 1.  In 2023, around 6.5 million households lived in moderately or severely inadequate housing. While the total number of inadequate homes declined slightly from 6.9 million in 2015 to 6.0 million in 2019, it rebounded to 6.7 million in 2021 and remained elevated in 2023.  The majority, around 4.8 million, of inadequate homes were moderately inadequate, while 1.65 million households lived in severely inadequate conditions in 2023.

The share of inadequate homes varies significantly by the age of the home (Figure 2). Older homes have higher rates of inadequacy. Homes built before 1940 have the highest inadequacy rate at 9%, followed by those built between 1940 and 1959 at 7%. While housing units from 1960 to 1979 show a moderate inadequacy rate of 5%, they account for the largest number of inadequate homes, with 1.2 million classified as moderately inadequate and 465,000 as severely inadequate in 2023. In contrast, newer homes (1980-Present) have lower inadequacy rates with the share steadily declining from 4% for homes built between 1980 and 1999 to 3% for those constructed from 2000 to the present.

Geographically, inadequate housing is most concentrated in smaller metro areas. Around 50.4% of moderately inadequate homes (2.4 million units) and 43.6% of severely inadequate homes (720,000 units) are in these areas in 2023. This trend is likely driven by aging housing stock and lower household income compared to major metro areas. However, major metro areas still have a substantial share of inadequate homes, with 29.7% of moderately inadequate (1.4 million) and 38.2% of severely inadequate units (631,000). Non-metro areas have the lowest total numbers, (953,000 moderately inadequate and 720,000 severely inadequate homes), though challenges persist.

In 2023, around 6.45 million households lived in inadequate housing, with more renters (3.5 million) than owners (2.8 million). Housing cost burdens varied greatly among these two groups: Among those households in inadequate homes, 1.9 million owners spent less than 30% of their income on housing, compared to 1.6 million renters. It suggests that many homeowners living in inadequate housing may indeed have the financial capacity to improve their housing conditions if they choose to do so. In contrast, renters in inadequate housing face greater financial constraints, with 1.1 million spending more than 50% of their income on housing, more than double the 480,000 cost-burdened owners. This disparity highlights the challenges renters are facing, including limited affordable housing options and a lack of control over property conditions.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


Single-family homes started in 2024 typically had two full bathrooms, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Annual Survey of Construction. Homes with three full bathrooms continued to have the second largest share of starts at around 23%. Meanwhile, both homes with four full bathrooms or more and homes with one bathroom or less made up under ten percent of homes started.

A full bathroom, as defined by the Bureau, is one that has a washbasin, a toilet and either a bathtub or shower, or a combination of a bathtub and shower. In 2024, 65.0% of new single-family homes started in 2024 had two full bathrooms, marking  the second consecutive year that this share has increased.  The share of single-family starts with three full bathrooms fell for the third straight year, down to 23.3%, while the share of single-family starts with four or more bathrooms increased to 7.2%. For starts with one full bathroom or less, the share fell to 4.5%.

Across the U.S., the East South Central division had the highest share, 71.6%, of new single-family starts having two full bathrooms. No other division had above a 70% share. The Census division with the lowest share was the Middle Atlantic, with 52.0% of new single-family starts reporting two full bathrooms. Starts in Middle Atlantic division were far more likely to have 4 full bathrooms or more, at 20.2%, more than double any other division in terms of share.

Half-Bathrooms

Most new single-family homes started in 2024 had no half-bathrooms at 53.7%. Following closely is the share of new single-family homes with one half-bathroom at 44.9%. New single-family starts with two or more half-bathrooms had a small share of 1.4% in 2024.  A half bathroom contains a toilet, bathtub, or shower, but not all facilities to be classified as a full bathroom.

Half-bathrooms are historically more prevalent in the New England Census division as compared to the other eight divisions. In 2024, 64.0% of new single-family homes started in the New England division had at least one half-bathroom. The lowest share occurred in the Pacific division, where only 38.3% of starts had at least one half-bathroom.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


In 2024, 6.9% of new single-family detached homes were teardowns (structures torn down and rebuilt in older neighborhoods), and another 20.1% were built on infill lots in older neighborhoods, according to the latest Builder Practices Survey (BPS) conducted by Home Innovation Research Labs. The BPS places new homes in one of four development categories. In addition to teardown and infill, the categories include “new residential development” and ”not in a residential development.” Homes built in a new residential development (i.e., subdivisions) are by far the most common type. 

There is a moderate amount of geographic variation in the teardown share. At the high end, over one in ten single-family homes were built on a lot where a structure had to be torn down in three of the nine Census Divisions: 15.0% in New England, 13.2% in the Pacific, and 10.1% in the East South Central. At the low end, the teardown share was only 4.8% in the South Atlantic.  

Nationally, homes built in older neighborhoods, but without tearing down another structure first, were nearly three times as common as teardowns. Again, however, there is geographic variation. Infill development accounted for over 30% of single-family homes in New England (38.0%) and the Middle Atlantic states (32.4%) but accounted for under 10% in the West South Central (9.7%) and Mountain (9.3%) divisions.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .


The share of new homes with decks edged down from 17.6% in 2023 to a new all-time low of 17.4% in 2024, according to NAHB tabulation of data from the HUD/Census Bureau Survey of Construction (SOC).

Over the longer term, the share of new homes with decks has been declining steadily since reaching a peak of 27.0% in 2007 and 2008. Amidst that decline, the share of new homes with patios has been trending upward, from under 50% to over 60% (despite a minor reversal of the upward trend in 2024). From the re-design of the SOC in 2005 through 2024, the correlation between the percentages of new homes with patios and decks is -0.85, indicating that patios and decks are functioning as substitutes over time—i.e., as patios become more common, they are crowding out decks.

Decks and patios appear to be substitutes across the U.S. On the single-family homes started in 2024, decks tended to be more common where patios were comparatively rare. For example, only 14% of the homes in the New England Census Division included patios, while a high of 69% included decks. Conversely, 82% of new homes included patios in the West South Central, while only 3% included decks. Across all nine divisions, the correlation between the percentages of new homes with decks and patios was -0.77.

Even so, decks remain relatively popular on new homes in some parts of the country. In addition to New England, over 30% of new homes came with decks in the West North Central (46%), Middle Atlantic (34%) and East South Central (31%) divisions. Moreover, in the latest edition of  What Home Buyers Really Want, 79% of recent and prospective home buyers rated a deck as an essential or desirable feature.

Additional detail on the characteristics of new-home decks is available from the Annual Builder Practices Survey (BPS) conducted by Home Innovation Research Labs.

Nationally, the 2025 BPS report (based on homes built in 2024) shows that the average size of a deck on a new single-family home is 278 square feet. Across Census Divisions, the average ranges from a low of 163 square feet in the West South Central to a high of 422 square feet in the Mountain division.

Beyond size, there continue to be strong geographic differences in builders’ choice of deck materials. On a square foot basis, treated wood is the most popular choice in the New England, South Atlantic, East South Central, and Mountain divisions. In the Middle Atlantic, East North Central, and West North Central, composite material predominates. In the Pacific Division, builders use concrete more than any other material, while in the West South Central there is a roughly even split between treated wood and concrete.

Of course, decks can be—and often are—added after the home itself is built. In the fourth-quarter 2024 survey for the NAHB/Westlake Royal Remodeling Market Index, decks ranked seventh among 22 listed remodeling projects, cited as a common job by 23% of the professional remodelers who responded to the survey.



This article was originally published by a eyeonhousing.org . Read the Original article here. .

Pin It